Print Page | Close Window

AXP340 Configuration 6.1.13 p22

Printed From: Avidyne
Category: Avidyne General
Forum Name: AXP340/322 ADS-B Transponder
Forum Description: Topics on the Avidyne AXP340/322 ADS-B Transponder
URL: http://forums.avidyne.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=449
Printed Date: 25 Dec 2024 at 12:45pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: AXP340 Configuration 6.1.13 p22
Posted By: Gary T
Subject: AXP340 Configuration 6.1.13 p22
Date Posted: 11 Nov 2014 at 4:39pm
On p. 22 of the AXP340 installation manual, section 6.1.13, the configuration choices are either
1090ES ADS-B TIS-B receiver or UAT receiver or none.  If I use my portable Clarity ADS-B receiver (receives both 1090ES TIS-B and UAT TIS-B signals), what is the configuration setting to program into
the AXP340?  My dealer programmed no 1090Es and no UAT ADS-B receivers since I have no
TSO approved ADS-B permanent mount receivers installed.


-------------
Gary-T



Replies:
Posted By: Gary T
Date Posted: 11 Nov 2014 at 5:07pm
From the Clarity ADS-B website FAQ:
To receive all ADS-B In services from the ADS-B ground infrastructure, aircraft must broadcast valid ADS-B Out messages that indicate their ADS-B-In capability.


-------------
Gary-T


Posted By: ddgates
Date Posted: 11 Nov 2014 at 10:15pm
John Collins queried the FAA on this topic, and has a letter back from them basically saying if you have an approved ADS-B out device (e.g. AXXP 340), and ANY in device (be it a GDL38, Stratus, or whatever), the intent is to provide the traffic data, and thus it is permissible to indicate that you DO have ADS-B in capability (that is, IN for these purposes doesn't have to be panel mount, or TSO).

I have a copy of the letter somewhere, in fact shared with my shop as they were insisting on the same logic your shop is.

Good luck.

-------------
David Gates


Posted By: ddgates
Date Posted: 11 Nov 2014 at 10:17pm
Originally posted by ddgates ddgates wrote:

John Collins queried the FAA on this topic, and has a letter back from them basically saying if you have an approved ADS-B out device (e.g. AXXP 340), and ANY in device (be it a GDL38, Stratus, or whatever), the intent is to provide the traffic data, and thus it is permissible to indicate that you DO have ADS-B in capability (that is, IN for these purposes doesn't have to be panel mount, or TSO).

I have a copy of the letter somewhere, in fact shared with my shop as they were insisting on the same logic your shop is.

Good luck.


Edit: I have a PDF of the letter I reference.

-------------
David Gates


Posted By: Gary T
Date Posted: 11 Nov 2014 at 11:19pm
David,
Would you be able to email me your PDF letter to mailto:Skylane8@aol.com" rel="nofollow - Skylane8@aol.com ?
Is John Collins a forum member or Avidyne employee?
Thank you for this information.
 
Gary


-------------
Gary-T


Posted By: SB Jim
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 8:24am
Neither.

John Collins owns and flies a V-tail Bonanza. He formerly owned an avionics shop. He's very knowledgeable on avionics related issues and writes for the American Bonanza Society magazine.


Posted By: Gary T
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 8:51am
Thank you for the reply/information.
 
After my first flight (Monday) with my AXP340/IFD540 I sent an email to :
mailto:9-AWA-AFS-300-ADSB-AvionicsCheck@faa.gov" rel="nofollow - 9-AWA-AFS-300-ADSB-AvionicsCheck@faa.gov
and I received their response (compliance report)  this morning.
 
Requested report attached. Everything looks good. The small issue flagged with Geo Alt was while the aircraft was on the ground so your system checks out good.


-------------
Gary-T


Posted By: ddgates
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 9:16am
Originally posted by Gary T Gary T wrote:



David,
Would you be able to email me your PDF letter to mailto:Skylane8@aol.com" rel="nofollow - Skylane8@aol.com ?
Is John Collins a forum member or Avidyne employee?
Thank you for this information.
 
Gary


sent.

DMG

-------------
David Gates


Posted By: ddgates
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 9:17am
Originally posted by Gary T Gary T wrote:



Thank you for the reply/information.
 
After my first flight (Monday) with my AXP340/IFD540 I sent an email to :
mailto:9-AWA-AFS-300-ADSB-AvionicsCheck@faa.gov" rel="nofollow - 9-AWA-AFS-300-ADSB-AvionicsCheck@faa.gov
and I received their response (compliance report)  this morning.
 
<font size="2" face="Arial">Requested report attached. Everything looks good. .


Got the same for my recent install.

-------------
David Gates


Posted By: chflyer
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 10:44am
What did you attach to your email to the FAA? This there a place on the FAA site that shows what they want to see as input for their compliance check?

-------------
Vince


Posted By: pburger
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 11:07am
chflyer,

You don't attach anything.  It's a real world test, not some paperwork review.  You have to have flown with the new equipment such that your ADS-B pings were being received.  You then send the e-mail to that FAA address, and they pull the logs and based on the data they received, they tell you if your data stream is compliant.  


Posted By: chflyer
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 4:38pm
Ah, ok. Clear.



-------------
Vince


Posted By: Gary T
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 5:56pm
In the email to the FAA, I mentioned the day I flew, time of day, flight route. Perhaps not necessary?

-------------
Gary-T


Posted By: Gary T
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 5:59pm
Most important-include your tail number

-------------
Gary-T


Posted By: MysticCobra
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2014 at 5:59pm
Originally posted by Gary T Gary T wrote:

In the email to the FAA, I mentioned the day I flew, time of day, flight route. Perhaps not necessary?

Not necessary.  Big Brother has all that data in the ADS-B world.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net